Prime Minister Harper can perfectly well communicate to Parliament, and to Canadians, without having to pander to the press and that he has, he has communicated that he is an undeniable undemocratic hypocrite.. but no one, no one can win reelection without the news media support.. and that is what upsets Harper still. You can fool some of the people some of the time, most of the people most of the time, but not all of the people.. and once exposed you look really bad, leave a real bad taste in our mouths at election time as well... so we spew you out of our mouths instead..
For the most part the self serving persons in politics in Canada is still really not acceptable. Politicians are paid by the tax payers to look after the good welfare of all citizens and sadly this has not been the case the last 20 years even in the federal cabinet. It should be still the case.
It is also interesting that the most insecure and the most abusive persons that I have encountered on the Internet the last two decades were Albertans. But I really did not expect this.. in a free speech democracy like Canada.. getting bashed too often on the Internet and too often by the bad rednecked Albertans for using my free speech, and they took my words so personally, are really sensitive to them? cause they are so applicable now too? and they next twisted what I had said, and bashed me personally cause they could not handle the facts, truths presented. Isn't it nice I have free speech like you. Me telling the undeniably truth as to how I see it now is not a right for anyone, even Albertans next to lie and slander me now as well..(Mat 7:3 KJV) And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother's eye, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye? 4 Or how wilt thou say to thy brother, Let me pull out the mote out of thine eye; and, behold, a beam is in thine own eye? 5 Thou hypocrite, first cast out the beam out of thine own eye; and then shalt thou see clearly to cast out the mote out of thy brother's eye.
**** Now here One bashing Quebec and it's government is supposedly OK but not bashing Alberta and it 's government? and how hypocritical that is now still too. In my years of posting on the Internet have clearly experienced that the Albertans are the biggest bashers, abusers of Houma rights too and now we can all even know why they have earned the common Canada wide reputation of being rednecks. And Imagine that it is undeniable that a control freak of Alberta still wants to dominate me still and tell me what I can and cannot write and to whom next as well. Dream on the reality will be a real shock.Please even Albertans do do stop promoting hatred yourself towards the truths and thus me. I have only worked in Alberta for many years, Edmonton, Calgary, Fort McMurray and I speak from what I saw and experienced firsthand myself. Outside of Alberta Alberta is known to have an undeniable REPUTATION OF BEING A REDNECK PLACE. Face the reality. As I told the Alberta Minister of Multiculturisnm in an open public forum at the Calgary Multicultural center, 70 percent of Alberta's are still undeniably racist, and I got standing applause for telling the truth. Whether you like it or not, admit it or not. The last Alberta Minster who did not like what I said about Alberta and threatened to take me to the Alberta Human rights commission, as per his pergoative to do so, next lost his election seat, the former useless Minister of Economic Development of Alberta too. I am an adult and I bear my own responsibility to speak and write what I want,and I can also do so now as well freely. Albertans should stop trying to make me their wrongful slave please, for I am a free persons, and please tell them to do quit trying to tell me what I can and cannot do now too, write too please. Do your own thing but leave me out of it please. But they too many of the Albertans sadly do remind me of a Little Conservative Stephen Harper dictator who also now so readily tries to cage, change the others when firstly he really needs to have more compassionate and to change himself, too take the big beam out of his own eyes so he can see better to help others. Can we please also let the me and the others read and write for themselves now without such interference of theirs or Harper's. Please.(Prov 29:16 KJV) When the wicked are multiplied, transgression increaseth: but the righteous shall see their fall. (Eccl 3:17 KJV) God shall judge the righteous and the wicked: for there is a time there for every purpose and for every work.Now we know also an where our PM Stephen Harper picked up and developed his bad habits for we see such behavior often in Alberta today.. and they think still they are better than all of the rest of Canada? pride cometh before a great fall.
The Reform, Alliance Conservative party in the 80's was started in Calgary Alberta mainly by PC rejects and the efforts of the many Christians who opposed the bad federal Progressive Conservative governments.
Even not all Christians now are alike Even in Alberta There are 3 types of persons now still too -
1: Non Christian persons
2: Mostly Pretentious, Hypocritical Christians,
3: Practicing real Christians
and speaking of even the Albertan entitlements ..The LORD is with you, while ye be with him; and if ye seek him, he will be found of you; but if ye forsake him, he will forsake you. (2 Chr 15:2 KJV) now even applies to all Albertans personally as well.
I went to Harper's Christian Missionary Alliance churches for 8 years and gave up on them for their unacceptable abuses, thefts, pretentiousness, and hypocrisy, the worst were the Allaince churches in Calgary and edmonton now as well, the details I had posted on the net many times too. As "I have said this to Canada's past PM Jean Chretien, Paul Martin too and their respective useless Justice Ministers.. One of the biggest undeniable evidence of the Evangelical's hypocrisy in Canada ... practicing divorce, pastors counseling divorce.. and not just their allowing gambling, drunkenness too, tax evasions. In my many years of experiences the professing evangelicals have personally admitted to me doing tax evasions just as much as the secular persons now have in Canada. The other evangelical churches I had been to in Calgary were at least equally bad, for they tended to practise, counsel marital divroce even. http://groups.msn.com/CanadaToday3/hypocrisyii.msnw
I next also had clearly noticed that too many Canadian pastors also had adulterous affairs, they had and wrongfully counseled often divorce too cause they were sex maniacs who wanted to leave their own wrongful divorce options open still too, unacceptably. If too many of the pastors I met are wrongfully sex maniacs than what about the rest? Kinda of explains why the politicians and the lawyers, judges too failed to deal adequately with these unacceptable issues too."
They may now even say the same words, but they do not mean the same thing, in fact the words do even have different meaning to them. It is amazing how even our elected Members of our political legislatures clearly cannot agree on what their own duties, functions now even are.. all while claiming to be here to service the people, many they would like to add the note "as well", because too many rather solely self serving Ministers they do wrongfully still do think they are there to get rich, to still make themselves more important, to advance themselves, their own incomes, pensions, to look after clearly firstly themselves.
But the word "Minister" means to serve others not themselves, and it does not mean to be Ministered too.. as even the honorable Prime Minister Paul Martin knows...and rightfully also wishes some of his colleagues would follow his example, his understanding of what it means to be a leader.
The Minister who says she believes in a democratic government, also clearly does not even believe in the same thing I do, for apparently she thinks that democracy means now she can now do whatever she wants without any personal restraints,The new Canadian Conservative federal Government and their new budget too also now are not governing but still electioneering, playing partiality, discrimination and favoritism and this is immoral even on their parts.(2 Tim 3:1 KJV) This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come. 2 For men shall be lovers of their own selves, covetous, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, 3 Without natural affection, trucebreakers, false accusers, incontinent, fierce, despisers of those that are good, 4 Traitors, heady, highminded, lovers of pleasures more than lovers of God; 5 Having a form of godliness, but denying the power thereof: from such turn away. .. 7 Ever learning, and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth. 8 Now as Jannes and Jambres withstood Moses, so do these also resist the truth: men of corrupt minds, reprobate concerning the faith. 9 But they shall proceed no further: for their folly shall be manifest unto all men, as theirs also was.And we now also can see the undeniable shock of Stephen Harper when his sins are now also been publicly exposed too.HEY HAD STEPHEN HARPER READ WHAT I HAD WRITTEN TO AND SENT ALSO TO HIM ABOUT PAUL MARTIN'S OWN MISTAKE IN DEALING WITH THE NEWS MEDIA EVEN A LONG TIME AGO http://groups.msn.com/CanadaToday/partiality.msnw HE STEPHEN HARPER COULD HAVE AVOIDED A LOT OF TROUBLE. DISCRIMINATION AND PARTIALITY BY ANY CIVIL AND PUBLIC SERVANTS, POLITICIANS IS ALSO REALLY UNACCEPTABLE AND MOST PEOPLE INWARDLY WOULD AGREE WITH THIS TRUTH UNDENIABLY TOO."One but cannot note that too many of the news media, public itself now does not support or believe in the personal credibility of the right Honourable Paul Martin PM.. At the beginning of this new year Paul Martin the new PM was told specifically by the some of the members of the Canadian News media that him showing partiality to any others was clearly unacceptable, that his honeymoon with the news media was over, and that he could not win the next election without the support of the News media as well. He is now seeing the results the hard way.. anyone showing partiality to their past liberal friends, overlooking their wrong doings will not be accepted now too.. as the low support of the liberals polls NOW do show as well. Time certainly to act on the good behalf of all Canadians.But it is still immoral, please do note that too, unethical for any elected Minister of the government to play politics, to pick and chose as to who she or him will help, to show partiality, favorites in doing their jobs.And any persons who shows partiality should be immediately exposed, dismissed from their offices, their subordinates included now as well. Simple AND still serious too.All Pastors too, all appointed Ministers, federally and provincially are to equally look after the good welfare of all, all Canadians, not matter who they are, rich or poor, Liberals or not. That include also the Justice, Health. Immigration Ministers now as well. (James 2 ) 8 You shall love your neighbour as yourself, ye do well: 9 But if you show false respect to any person, you are committing wrong, sin, and are condemned by the law as transgressors. (James 2 ) 2 For if there come into your presence a man with a gold ring, in costly apparel, and there come in also a poor man in vile clothing; 3 And you still do show respect to him that weareth the costly clothing, and you say unto him, Sit here in a good place; and say to the poor, Stand over there, or sit int he corner: 4 Are you not then partial in your acts, and have are become bad judges with evil thoughts?The young, the Sick, handicapped, Poor persons do need special help . (Deu 15:11 KJV) For the poor shall never cease out of the land: therefore I command thee, saying, Thou shalt open thine hand wide unto thy brother, to thy poor, and to thy needy, in thy land. (Gal 2:10 KJV) Only they would that we should remember the poor; the same which I also was forward to do. (Eph 4:28 KJV) Let him that stole steal no more: but rather let him labour, working with his hands the thing which is good, that he may have to give to him that needeth.And we now this week also can see the undeniable shock of Stephen Harper when his sins are now also been publicly exposed too. It is easy to get under Stephen's Harper's Skin.. ONE JUST HAS TO POINT OUT THEIR OBVIOUS UNACCEPTABLE SINS IN PUBLIC AND THEY GO HAYWIRE NEXT FOR THEY THINK THEY GOT AWAY WITH THEM.
it is still immoral, please do note that too, unethical for any elected Minister of the government to play politics, to pick and chose as to who she or him will help, to show partiality, favorites in doing their jobs. And any persons who shows partiality should be immediately exposed, dismissed from their offices, their subordinates included now as well. Simple AND still serious too.
DISCRIMINATION AND PARTIALITY BY ANY CIVIL AND PUBLIC SERVANTS, POLITICIANS IS ALSO REALLY UNACCEPTABLE AND MOST PEOPLE INWARDLY WOULD AGREE WITH THIS TRUTH UNDENIABLY TOO.
God himself does not take personal, human rights and legal abuse quietly now.. so many people wonder how will this play out, how will it end.. and the answer is always the same and predictable, unavoidable especially for Mr. S Harper ..In Canada we also do wrongfully tend to like to show false partiality to the rich, politicians, the professionals such as business persons, pastors, lawyers, doctors, nurse, cops, realtors, accountants .. well I rightfully do not do this... not even when they do steal, lie, cheat, break the laws too. The past abuse of the Canadian tax payers money has been an abuse that has brought down Brian Mulroney and the Progressive Conservative Party forever now too... Canadian History has many recent History of short lived Prime Ministers too like Kim Campbell, Joe Clark, John Turner too. The right and only approach here too is both to get to the bottom of it but also to insure all of the past bad guys are punished without any partiality.. evidentiary justice being also carried out is the issue here now too." (1 Tim 5:20 KJV) Them that sin rebuke before all, that others also may fear. 21 I charge thee before God, and the Lord Jesus Christ, and the elect angels, that thou observe these things without preferring one before another, doing nothing by partiality. 22 Lay hands suddenly on no man, neither be partaker of other men's sins: keep thyself pure.there are thus too may wolves in sheep clothing in the federal, provincial, municipal governments, civil and public services as well.. much too many.. fire them all there too now!and "It is not the responsibility of the government to make our jobs easier. And it is not our job to serve as the Opposition.
The task of holding the government to account, in a parliamentary democracy, is assigned to Members of Parliament. Were the government to presume to decide who could ask questions in Question Period, or in what order, that would be an outrage. This is a lovers' quarrel. email@example.com " http://www.canada.com/nationalpost/news/issuesideas/story.html?id=b981b03c-9e15-416e-b907-e46c0efbb019&p=2
This is a lovers' quarrel. (Rev 3:19 KJV) As many as I love, I rebuke and chasten: be zealous therefore, and repent.
This is a lovers' quarrel. an embarrassing one that is being displayed world wide too
Prime Minister Harper do note this.
Harper is winning in the media wars.. winning at having his name TARNISHED BY MANY AS PREDICATED TOO.The story that will still not go away " Yves Malo, new president of the press gallery and a reporter for TVA, sat down with The Hill Times last week to answer some questions about the fallout between the Prime Minister's Office and the Parliamentary Press Gallery. What is at the heart of this dispute with the Prime Minister's Office? "It's only a matter of, are we going to let the Prime Minister's Office choose which journalists are going to ask him a question. There are other things to discuss, but the main thing is that one. That's the first subject. Then the Cabinet meetings, photo ops. These are the three subjects where it's not going well. We have to manage to find a way to resolve the question of the list, what we call 'the list.'" How long has the Prime Minister been using this list? "He started that right away. We tried their lists, and a month-and-a-half later we saw very well that it doesn't work, that some people never got questions. That's why at the last general assembly we decided unanimously that we won't go along with their lists." Former prime minister Paul Martin had been choosing reporters to ask questions during the 2006 election. Reporters don't necessarily like that but say it's acceptable because it's not in a Parliamentary setting. What is it about the Parliamentary setting that changes the relationship? "An election is not the same thing as day-to-day coverage. You're in a bubble. It's very dense, 30 to 40 days, and you have a message to deliver. It's another context. It's not the same thing. So you cannot apply that formula to day-to-day coverage because we have to serve our public and the public need to know that we are independent, to be sure that we are not picked by the Prime Minister's Office because we think the way they think. We have to be sure that people know we are independent." How have journalists' access to government been taken away? "First, no questions at photo ops, the first thing they removed. Then they did not inform us of the Cabinet meetings. Then no more cameras on the third floor. After that, it was the list. So they removed almost all the access." It appears the Prime Minister feels that he doesn't need the national media, saying he will avoid it. Is that approach going to work? "I don't think so. We are more than 200 journalists here on the Hill and when he said he's going to talk to local media, it's a weird strategy because the local media have very good journalists, but their concerns are not national, their concerns are local. If a local journalist asks a national question ... they don't necessarily have the background to put forward a good question and a good follow-up question. Not because they're not good journalists. They are, but their concerns are local, not national. So when he tries to avoid the national press, I think it's a mistake, not only a mistake but it's too bad for the public to be well-served and well-informed of what's happening in Ottawa." What's it like for daily reporters in this communications environment, who need material every day? This is a very controlled communications environment, and there's a big difference between the work of columnists and daily reporters who need material every day. Are they finding it hard to get stories, or to get calls back from the PMO? "To get a story every day, it's not tough. The only problem is with the PMO. When a minister is doing a press conference, we line up behind the microphones everything goes very well. We have no problem with that. Yes, the PMO is not calling back very much when you call there. I've never spoken to Sandra Buckler [Mr. Harper's communication director]. She's never answered any of my calls. It's not tough to do a story, and if the Prime Minister refuses to talk to me, well, no problem. I can talk to [Liberal Leader of the Opposition Opposition] Bill Graham, [NDP Leader] Jack Layton, [Bloc Québecois Leader] Gilles Duceppe. I can talk to other ministers, I can talk to lots of people. I prefer to have Stephen Harper, but for the moment, he's chosen not to speak to us. We have to resolve the problem sooner or later, and I prefer that sooner." What's the next step for the press gallery? "Open the lines of communication with the PMO. I wish that everything was going fine. All the editors of the major newspapers are in Halifax this weekend for a big reunion, and we expect from them their support." The Hill TimesMost of the Canadian are like pacifist sheep like Ostriches who do not support losers, they kill such wounded animals, do not give them media access and thus losers cannot hope to get reelected by paying for the too costly adds themselves.Most of the Canadian are like pacifist sheep like Ostriches eventually get fed up with the losers, the people who continue to fight and not resolve their issues, and thus they will not take final sides but permanently reject next all of the parties involved. Harper and the news media can note this./ Great undeniable Canadians truthsAnd this is what it means to be a Conservative? Are the Albertans economic funds, future being robbed blind, given to private enterprises, and were bribes paid to the government leaders do this? "So what does Premier Klein intend to do with "Alberta's" oil? Since he took over as provincial leader in 1992 he has virtually taken the government out of the oil business (Syncrude was partly owned by the government and royalites were higher prior to 1996) and handed it over to Big Oil. Not that government is the best owner/operator but provincial revenue would be greater within a different tax regimen. So Albertans got $400 last year? Whooppee, ride 'em cowboy Mr. Klein - it makes great copy and every consumer can buy a new toy.Oh, by the way - why are royalties on oil one of the lowest in the world? How come Norwegian coffers get over three times as much while the economy remains competitive (one of the top ten most competitive countries in the world) and oil companies are banging at the door? They have a kinder social policy too. ...And will the enormous water resources used to get that Black Gold remain ONLY an Albertan problem? Moreover, is Ottawa "stealing our oil" or harvesting the fruits of their own generous resource tax policies (accelerated capital cost allowance) where Tar Sand companies are allowed a 100% deduction on the cost of equipment against a project's first year of income?" http://thetyee.ca/Views/2006/05/29/HarperMaySlip/